A
tax haven is a state, country or territory where certain taxes are levied at a
low rate or not at all.[1] Individuals and/or corporate entities can find it
attractive to establish shell subsidiaries or move themselves to areas with
reduced or nil taxation levels. This creates a situation of tax competition
among governments. following characteristics as indicative of it:
a)
nil
or nominal taxes;
b)
lack
of effective exchange of tax information with foreign tax authorities;
c)
lack
of transparency in the operation of legislative, legal or administrative
provisions;
d)
no
requirement for a substantive local presence; and
e)
self-promotion
as an offshore financial center.
f)
Some
features of these tax havens are:
g)
•Low
rate or complete absence of income tax on foreign investment and income.
h)
•High
degree of economical and political stability and a political system, which
directly or indirectly encourages and fosters business activity at the center.
i)
•Strict
and well enforced rules of banking secrecy.
j)
•Absence
of exchange control
k)
•Availability
of supporting infrastructure such as an efficient communications and
transportation network.
l)
•Presence
of well developed legal system and professional accounting expertise.
m)
•Investor’s
confidence due to past credential.
n)
•No
incidence of violence or criminal activities.
o)
These
features encourage various types of business operations some of which are
bonafide but most of them generate what has been termed as ‘dirty offshore
funds’.
The
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) identifies three
key factors in considering whether a jurisdiction is a tax haven:
1.Nil
or only nominal taxes. Tax havens impose nil or only nominal taxes (generally
or in special circumstances) and offer themselves, or are perceived to offer
themselves, as a place to be used by non-residents to escape high taxes in
their country of residence.
2.Protection
of personal financial information. Tax havens typically have laws or
administrative practices under which businesses and individuals can benefit
from strict rules and other protections against scrutiny by foreign tax
authorities. This prevents the transmittance of information about taxpayers who
are benefiting from the low tax jurisdiction.
3.Lack
of transparency. A lack of transparency in the operation of the legislative,
legal or administrative provisions is another factor used to identify tax
havens. The OECD is concerned that laws should be applied openly and
consistently, and that information needed by foreign tax authorities to
determine a taxpayer’s situation is available. Lack of transparency in one
country can make it difficult, if not impossible, for other tax authorities to
apply their laws effectively. ‘Secret rulings’, negotiated tax rates, or other
practices that fail to apply the law openly and consistently are examples of a
lack of transparency. Limited regulatory supervision or a government’s lack of
legal access to financial records are contributing factors.
No comments:
Post a Comment